Semantic Priming, Lexical Framing, and Attitude Formation: A Psycholinguistic Study of Word Associations in Undergraduate Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v4i2.2104Keywords:
Semantic Priming, Lexical Framing, Psycholinguistics, Attitude FormationAbstract
This study explores how undergraduate students in Pakistan relate to semantic priming, lexically framed influence, and the formation of attitudes from a psycholinguistic perspective. Utilizing the Spreading Activation Theory and Framing Theory, the research analyzes how lexical stimuli impact students’ word associations and evaluative attitudes towards conceptual understanding (academic vs social). A mixed methods research design was used to carry out this investigation through both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The target participants were undergraduate students enrolled in an English medium institution in Bachelor of Science (BS) programs, specifically BS English, BS Psychology, and BS Education. Data collection methods consisted of a demographic questionnaire, a Primed Word Association Task, and Lexical Framing Task with positive and negative frames measured using Likert scale responses. The quantitative analysis included frequency counts and descriptive statistics, while the qualitative analysis involved thematic coding of participant responses. The results showed that participants made strong positive semantic associations between English and both "communication," "opportunity," "achievement," and "success." Participants were also more positively influenced by lexical framing for learning English and developing their academic abilities than negatively. The negative response to the framing task was primarily due to the words chosen to communicate stress, barriers, and struggle. Additionally, the study found that semantic priming activates automatic cognitive associations, whereas lexical framing influences evaluative judgments made consciously. Overall, the study provides evidence demonstrating how significantly language influences cognition and perception.
References
Albarracin, D., & Dai, W. (2021). Priming Effects on Behavior and Priming Behavioral Concepts: A Commentary on Sherman and Rivers (2020). Psychological Inquiry, 32(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2021.1889319
Alejandro, J. (2024). The Role of Language in Thought Formation and Personality. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 2(4), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.37329/ijms.v2i4.3759
Bargh, J. A., Schwader, K. L., Hailey, S. E., Dyer, R. L., & Boothby, E. J. (2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
Leonard, L. B. (2011). The Primacy of Priming in Grammatical Learning and Intervention: A Tutorial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(2), 608–621. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0122)
Lerner, I., Bentin, S., & Shriki, O. (2012). Spreading Activation in an Attractor Network With Latching Dynamics: Automatic Semantic Priming Revisited. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1339–1382. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12007
Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
Mangat, A., Taikh, A., Gagne, C., & Spalding, T. L. (2026). The influence of prime characteristics in semantic priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1680365
McKenzie, C. R. M., Sher, S., Liu, X. S., & Kleiman-Lynch, L. J. (2025). When and why framing effects are neither errors nor mistakes. Mind & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-025-00338-9
McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic Priming. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203338001
Noor, F., Aditiya, & Seelro, S. (2025). The Role of Linguistic Priming and Framing in Shaping Climate Change Perceptions and Pro-Environmental Behaviors in Pakistani Youth. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies, 3(3), 4217–4238. https://doi.org/10.71281/jals.v3i3.418
Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research, 66(3), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0086-5
Romanchuk, S., Yuhan, N., Chernyakova, A., Torchynskyi, M., & Vysotskyi, A. (2025). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Semantic Priming in the Process of Learning English: Peculiarities of Bilinguals and Monolinguals. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 25(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v25i1.1013
Slowiaczek, L. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1986). Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197698
Ullah, F. (2024). The dynamic interplay between language and mind: Exploring cognitive impacts through empirical and theoretical perspectives. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(4), 400–423. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11514393
van Giesen, R. I., Fischer, A. R. H., van Dijk, H., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015). Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation toward Familiar and Unfamiliar Attitude Objects. PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0141790. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141790
