Media Portrayals of the Israel-Palestine Conflict: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Al-Jazeera and The New York Times

Abstract

In this thorough critical discourse analysis, the researcher examines how Al-Jazeera and The New York Times, two major international news sources, present the Israel-Palestine issue. This paper highlights the various thematic, linguistic, and visual framing techniques used by these media behemoths to craft stories that appeal to their target audiences and editorial philosophies. In order to elicit empathy, Al-Jazeera constantly places a high priority on themes of historical injustice and humanitarianism, highlighting the pain and displacement of Palestinians. By employing language and imagery that is security-centric, The New York Times, on the other hand, focuses primarily on geopolitical and security-related subjects, especially Israel's problems. These results emphasize the media's ability to impact and maybe reinforce preexisting opinions or biases, underscoring the powerful role that framing plays in influencing public perception and policy discourse. The study emphasizes how important it is for consumers to have a critical media literacy, saying that in order to gain a comprehensive grasp of complex conflicts, they should recognize framing methods and consult a variety of sources. The purpose of this research is to promote global empathy, peace, and informed debate by adding to the existing discussion about the impact of media framing, especially when it comes to prolonged wars. To build an informed and just global community, it is imperative to comprehend the framing power of the media.