Climate Change and the Future of Maritime Boundaries Rethinking Baselines, Islands and Maritime Entitlements in the Indian Ocean

Authors

  • Mushtari Khanum Judicial Officer, PhD Scholar, Dadabhoy University.
  • Dr. Muhammad Tahir Head of Pakistan Coast Guard Educational Institutions (Universities/Colleges). Email drtahir949@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v4i1.2597

Keywords:

Climate Change, Sea Level Rise, Maritime Boundaries, Baselines, Islands, Indian Ocean, UNCLOS, International Court of Justice

Abstract

Climate change is altering the physical geography on which the international law of the sea was designed. Rising seas, coastal erosion, reef degradation and recurrent inundation can move low water lines, submerge low tide elevations and impair the habitability of small islands. These processes are especially consequential in the Indian Ocean, where continental coasts, archipelagic States and low lying island States depend upon maritime zones for fisheries, security, transport and public revenue. This article examines whether maritime baselines, island status and maritime entitlements should continue to follow an ambulatory model or should acquire legal stability once lawfully established and publicized. It uses doctrinal and comparative legal analysis, supported by a limited descriptive examination of climate data and Indian Ocean dispute practice. The analysis finds that the text of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea does not expressly resolve climate driven coastline change, but recent State practice, the work of the International Law Commission and the 2025 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice substantially strengthen the case for maintaining duly established maritime zones. The article argues for a model of functional permanence. Under this model, deposited baselines and outer limits remain effective despite climate related physical change, established maritime boundaries remain stable, and the legal status of an island is assessed with caution rather than repeatedly recalculated after each environmental shock. Transparency, accurate hydrographic information, negotiated boundary settlement and judicial clarification remain essential. This approach best reconciles textual fidelity, equity, climate justice and regional stability in the Indian Ocean.

References

Alliance of Small Island States. (2024). AOSIS leaders declaration on sea level rise and statehood. https://www.aosis.org/aosis-leaders-declaration-on-sea-level-rise-and-statehood/

Caron, D. D. (1990). When law makes climate change worse: Rethinking the law of baselines in light of a rising sea level. Ecology Law Quarterly, 17(4), 621–653.

Chen, X., & Xu, Q. (2022). Mitigating effects of sea level rise on maritime features through the international law making process in the law of the sea. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 1072390. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1072390

Churchill, R. R., Lowe, A. V., & Sander, A. (2022). The law of the sea (4th ed.). Manchester University Press.

Commonwealth Heads of Government. (2024). Apia Commonwealth Ocean Declaration for one resilient common future.

Freestone, D., & Schofield, C. (2021). Climate change, sea level rise and maritime baselines: Responding to the plight of low lying atoll States. Global Environmental Politics, 21(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00564

Gerrard, M. B., & Wannier, G. E. (Eds.). (2013). Threatened island nations: Legal implications of rising seas and a changing climate. Cambridge University Press.

Government of Maldives. (2019). Submission of the Maldives to the International Law Commission concerning sea level rise in relation to international law. United Nations.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896

International Court of Justice. (2012). Territorial and maritime dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012, p. 624.

International Court of Justice. (2021). Maritime delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya), judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2021, p. 206.

International Court of Justice. (2025). Obligations of States in respect of climate change, advisory opinion of 23 July 2025. https://www.icj-cij.org/case/187

International Law Association. (2018). Resolution 5/2018: International law and sea level rise.

International Law Commission. (2025). Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its seventy sixth session (A/80/10). United Nations.

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (2021). Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean, preliminary objections, judgment of 28 January 2021.

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. (2024). Request for an advisory opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on climate change and international law, advisory opinion of 21 May 2024.

McAdam, J. (2012). Climate change, forced migration, and international law. Oxford University Press.

Murphy, S. D. (2023). Ambulatory versus fixed baselines under the law of the sea. American University International Law Review, 38, 481–515.

Pacific Islands Forum. (2021). Declaration on preserving maritime zones in the face of climate change related sea level rise.

Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2016). The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China), award of 12 July 2016.

Prescott, V., & Schofield, C. (2005). The maritime political boundaries of the world (2nd ed.). Martinus Nijhoff.

Rayfuse, R. (2013). Sea level rise and maritime zones: Preserving the maritime entitlements of disappearing States. In M. B. Gerrard & G. E. Wannier (Eds.), Threatened island nations: Legal implications of rising seas and a changing climate (pp. 167–191). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198776.010

Schofield, C., & Freestone, D. (2019). Islands awash amidst rising seas: Sea level rise and insular status under the law of the sea. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 34(3), 391–414.

Soons, A. H. A. (1990). The effects of a rising sea level on maritime limits and boundaries. Netherlands International Law Review, 37(2), 207–232.

United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331.

United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397.

Wendebourg, M. R. (2023). Interpreting the law of the sea in the context of sea level rise. Journal of Environmental Law, 35(3), 499–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqad019

World Meteorological Organization. (2023). State of the global climate 2022. WMO No. 1316.

World Meteorological Organization. (2025). State of the climate in Asia 2024. World Meteorological Organization.

Downloads

Published

26-02-2026

How to Cite

Khanum, M., & Tahir, D. M. (2026). Climate Change and the Future of Maritime Boundaries Rethinking Baselines, Islands and Maritime Entitlements in the Indian Ocean. Social Science Review Archives, 4(1), 7322–7333. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v4i1.2597