Political Polarization and Democratic Stability in Pakistan

Authors

  • Nabeela Mazhar Department of Political Science, University of Sargodha, Pakistan, Email: nabeelamazhar81@gmail.com
  • Asiya Saif Alvi Associate Professor, Chairperson, Department of Political Science, University of Sargodha, Pakistan, Email: asia.saif@uos.edu.pk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v4i1.2458

Keywords:

Political Polarization; Democratic Stability; Pakistan; Political Institutions; Governance; Electoral Politics; Democratic Consolidation

Abstract

Political polarization is now a norm of politics in the modern context of Pakistan, which has influenced the competition between the parties and the relationship between the civil and the military, the behaviour of the judicial system, and popular trust in the institutions of democracy. Theoretical framework and lenses of the study, which can be illuminated with the help of the Democratic Consolidation Theory (Linz and Stepan, 1996), are used to discuss the causes and outcomes of the polarization of democracy between the years 2008 and 2026 by resorting to secondary data as examples, peer-reviewed literature, institutional reports, and newspaper analysis. It is found that polarization in Pakistan is relational and elite-based (McCoy and Somer, 2019), which has its basis in a weak intra-party democracy, a disintegrated media space, politicised institutions of accountability, and enduring civil-military tutelage. These dynamics have undermined horizontal accountability and electoral legitimacy and have driven the system to tutelary democracy as opposed to consolidated democracy (Mohsin Ali, 2025). The paper concludes that judicial and electoral independence, intra-party reformation, responsible media practices, and dialogue between electoral parties are needed to turn this path around.

References

Alam, I. (2025). Political polarization in Pakistan: Implications for governance and social cohesion. Journal of Pakistan Administration, 46(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.65755/jpa-20254601-101

Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review. (2025). The rise of ideological polarization in Pakistan: Implications for electoral politics and democratic stability. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review.

Farooq, S., Rafique, A., & Qambar, G. (2016). Independent judiciary and its role in nation-building: Case study of Pakistan. Global Regional Review, 1, 99–115.

Journal of Media Horizons. (2026). Digital political polarization and democratic stability in Pakistan: The role of social media in electoral politics. Journal of Media Horizons, 7(5), 145–154.

Kukreja, V. (2003). Contemporary Pakistan: Political processes, conflicts and crises. Sage Publications.

Kureshi, Y. (2025). To reinforce or replace: Courts and democratic backsliding. Government and Opposition, 60(4), 1247–1272.

Kureshi, Y., & Waseem, M. (2024). Opposition politics and the judiciary in Pakistan: The Panama Papers case and the politics of accountability. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics.

Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Malik, A. A. (2023). Judicial review and the rule of law in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 18(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2023.28

McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576

McCoy, J., & Somer, M. (2019). Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: Comparative evidence and possible remedies. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 234–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818782

Mohsin Ali, S. A. (2025). Democratic backsliding and public administration in Pakistan's hybrid regime: A balance of power approach. Policy Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2538846

Pakistan Journal of Social Science Review. (2025). Democratic instability in Pakistan (2020–2024): Populism, institutional instability, and governance challenges. Pakistan Journal of Social Science Review.

Saeed, K., & Ali, A. (2026). Institutional decay and democratic erosion in a delegative democracy: Deconstructing political stability in Pakistan, 2018–2025. International Journal of Policy Studies, 6(1), 31–46.

Slater, D., & Arugay, A. A. (2018). Polarizing figures: Executive power and institutional conflict in Asian democracies. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 92–106.

Somer, M., & McCoy, J. (2019). Transformations through polarizations and global threats to democracy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 8–22.

V-Dem Institute. (2025). Democracy report 2025: 25 years of autocratization. University of Gothenburg.

Zafar, A. (2026). Democracy on trial: A historical analysis of Pakistan's political struggles. Advance Social Science Archive Journal, 5(1), 1361–1371.

Downloads

Published

27-03-2026

How to Cite

Mazhar, N., & Alvi, A. S. (2026). Political Polarization and Democratic Stability in Pakistan. Social Science Review Archives, 4(1), 5851–5860. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v4i1.2458