Sustainable Tourism Development in Pakistan and China: A Comparative Analysis of Practices and Policies

Authors

  • Shahid Hussain MPhil scholar at Xi'an jiaotong university, Xi'an city, Shannxi Province China
  • Ikram Hussain BS Political Science University of Malakand,
  • Muhammad Yasir MS scholar in Political Science, International Islamic university Islamabad
  • Tanveer Ahmad MS scholar in Economics international Islamic university Islamabad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v2i2.152

Keywords:

Pakistan, China, Tourism, Development, Policies, countries

Abstract

This study seeks to evaluate sustainable practices in tourism between Pakistan and China through an understanding of the subject matter practices, policies, and problems on both sides of the order. It Can Help In Facilitating Economic Development Free Opening in Another Tab Sustainable tourism is very important because it has all of the economic benefits but it will permit you not to waste important environmental and cultural factors. The qualitative research compares policy documents and interviews with stakeholders and case studies to investigate the impact of sustainable tourism policies in both countries. Among its main findings is that although China has devised widespread policies and built-up community involvement, Pakistan faces serious challenges with its governance and development infrastructure. The paper ends by drawing implications for both countries with policy frameworks, local community participation, and lessons learned from each other. These insights are intended to enhance policy-making and tourism stakeholders to promote sustainable tourism which is an essential prerequisite for contributing to local communities and natural resource conservation in Pakistan and China

Downloads

Published

2024-11-20

How to Cite

Shahid Hussain, Ikram Hussain, Muhammad Yasir, & Tanveer Ahmad. (2024). Sustainable Tourism Development in Pakistan and China: A Comparative Analysis of Practices and Policies. Social Science Review Archives, 2(2), 1016–1027. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v2i2.152