Judicial Activism and Comparative Analysis of Suo Motu Notices Taken by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar and Iftikhar Chaudhry

Abstract

This research study explores the concept of judicial activism and conducts a comparative analysis of the Suo moto notices taken by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar and Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, two prominent Chief Justices of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Judicial activism refers to the proactive role of the judiciary in addressing societal issues and promoting social justice, often through the use of suo moto notices, where the court takes cognizance of a matter on its own initiative, The comparative analysis has focused on the similarities and differences in the approach, scope, and impact of the suo moto notices taken by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar and Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry during their respective tenures. This research study has examined the key areas of intervention, such as human rights, governance, public welfare, and accountability, This study has utilized a qualitative research methodology, including a comprehensive review of relevant literature, case analysis, and comparative examination of the judicial decisions and outcomes, This research study found that excessive and miss use of Suo moto power has badly affected political system of the country, This research study recommends that judiciary should play a balance role in order to have in effective federal parliamentary democratic system in the country