Monitoring Student Well-being: Using AI to Detect Offensive Language in Educational Platforms

Authors

  • Fadia Shah Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan. Email: fadiashah13@yahoo.com
  • Yasir Shah School of Business, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China. Email: yasirshah_pk@yahoo.com
  • Faiza Shah School of Political Science and Public Administration, Henan Normal University, China. Email: faizashah55@gmail.com
  • Aftab Hussain Tabasam Business Administration, University of Poonch Rawalakot. Email: aftabtabasam@upr.edu.pk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i4.1260

Keywords:

Machine Learning, Student Performance, Abusive Languages, Text Mining, Feature extraction, Sentiment analysis

Abstract

Because of the quickly developing communication modes of individuals in informal communities, individuals bought into these interpersonal organisations at an extraordinary rate to convey and impart their contemplations to different supporters. Twitter was chosen for this study because of its notoriety and simple admission to information. This review proposes a strategy to recognise oppressive substance in Twitter information that contains tweets, retweets, and remarks. Oppressive language is arranged in view of elements through the component extraction interaction and classes, either harmful or not. The motivation behind this significant advance is to provide the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, which will be useful for dealing with significant stages. While growing new systems or strategies to distinguish harmful substances in the client content of informal organisations. Furthermore, this correlation provides additional information on which system is suitable for determining the degree of disagreeableness to further develop exactness.

Downloads

Published

19-11-2025

How to Cite

Fadia Shah, Yasir Shah, Faiza Shah, & Aftab Hussain Tabasam. (2025). Monitoring Student Well-being: Using AI to Detect Offensive Language in Educational Platforms. Social Science Review Archives, 3(4), 1650–1663. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i4.1260